On 21.06.2017 [04:32:18 -0000], Christian Seiler wrote: > Hi, > > I'm one of the Debian Maintainers of open-isns and I just saw this bug > here because I saw the upstream pull request for the fixes to the test > suite. First of all: thanks for improving the package. The main reason > I've packaged that is because it was split out of open-iscsi, and I'm > not really a user of iSNS itself.
Of course! To be honest, neither am I, beyond knowing what the technology is supposed to do :) > I would like to keep any diff between Debian and Ubuntu to a minimum - 100% on board. To be clear, my next step once I get the change into Ubuntu was an immediate submittodebian (and also why I sent it upstream first, I'm hoping I can prod Lee to do a new release with the passing test suite). > ideally there'd be no diff at all. I'd also be happy to include any > Ubuntu-specific changes in the upstream Debian package. The upstream > test suite you've added to DEP-8 appears to be something that would also > be useful to run in Debian. If it's OK with you I'd like to review the > changes you made in this regard and include them in the Debian package > itself. Yep, absolutely! Like I said above, that was my plan as well. I see no benefit to Ubuntu running tests that Debian doesn't :) > Apart from that: a short comment on what you wrote in the "Quality > Assurance" part of this report: > > > * No debconf questions are asked during installation. > > This is not entirely true: no debconf questions are asked when > installing the library packages themselves in the current Debian You are right, I should have made that more clear. The only binary packages that need to be in main for this MIR are: libisns-dev libisns-nocrypto0-udeb libisns0 as documented at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed. The open-isns daemon/server packages will continue to live in universe. > package, but because how the software works, the discovery daemon (pkg > :open-isns-discoveryd) and the server itself (pkg:open-isns-server) will > indeed ask debconf questions on installation and removal. That said: if > you have any ideas how to handle that without debconf questions, I'd be > open to hearing that. (In Debian we're now at the beginning of the next > release cycle, so it'd be no problem at all to change the behavior.) I'm happy to take a look at this, though! I'll put it on my backlog to look at this cycle :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689963 Title: [MIR] open-isns To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-isns/+bug/1689963/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
