1. Who's the person in Maintainer that doesn't seem to be you nor "ubuntu
developers" as customary?
2. can debhelper compat level be the last?
3. same for Standards-Version?
4. Vcs-* fields point to the upstream repository instead of the packaging one
5. please rename debian/docs following the package name, it *does* cause a lot
of confusion to people not used to it to discover that it's not installed where
they would expect it…
6. in d/rules please move that --buildsystem option to the main dh options
instead of repeating it everywhere
7. also in d/rules please consider removing those unused code commented out,
and removing that $(DHFLAGS) that is used only one
8. why do you call dh_strip manually, in only few packages? is dh_strip doing
it wrong by itself?
9. why isn't the library in an appropriately named libary package, as all
library should be? Installing a library in an application package doesn't
sound like a good idea at all; you also overrode a lintian tag about this
without giving a single comment.
10. lintian also contains some suggestion that you should definitely follow;
please run a full lintian (with pedantic enabled); I'm mostly referring to the
tags related to the binaries descriptions
11. d/copyright doesn't have a paragraph for 'Files: *'; whilst in itself is
not a problem lintian highlights how you are not covering the 'LICENSE' file
itself; probably the first paragraph should be turned into 'Files: *'
Note that I didn't do a copyright check of the package.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699333
Title:
[needs-packaging] vala-panel
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntubudgie/+bug/1699333/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
