>I agree on 384 being getrandom and there are other cases like [1].

I did the same research :)

>I don't know details but would consider the pure lack of the system call 
>support a feature request to >upstream qemu.
>We could add a qemu upstream task here for that FR - in the worst case we are 
>told why we are wrong - >opinions?

yes please!

>On the case itself for now I'd recommend to get back the section:
>ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),armhf)
>        TERM=vt100 dh_auto_test || true
>Which maybe was there for similar reasons.

I think this used to hang the builders, IIRC, but seems to pass now

uploaded in artful


You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

  testsuite fails under qemu (SIGILL) works fine on real hw [missing
  getrandom 384 syscall]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

ubuntu-bugs mailing list

Reply via email to