https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-
upgrades/+bug/1714019/+attachment/4942097/+files/unattended-
upgrades_0.93.1ubuntu8-to-0.96ubuntu1.patch appears to be a reversed
patch, and doesn't have a changelog entry for 0.96ubuntu1.
Which parts of this change is it that you believe violate feature freeze
and require an FFe? (Bugfixes do not require an FFe.)
If an FFe is required for the merge, why do a merge rather than cherry-
picking of the specific bugfix changes?
>From NEWS.Debian, I understand that a key change is to turn on the
minimal steps handling by default. What is the impact of this change on
the time it takes to do a typical update? Are we in any way increasing
the risk of an unclean shutdown due to a laptop running out of battery
during the upgrade, where this wouldn't have happened if we weren't
doing minimal steps?
debian/postinst changes the minimum version at which installinit upgrade
handling is applied, and will be reapplied to systems which have the
existing artful package installed. Could this be a problem? E.g., does
this forcibly override the user's preference on upgrade if they have
disabled the service in systemd?
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1714019
Title:
Please merge unattended-upgrades 0.96 (main) from Debian unstable
(main)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1714019/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
