On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:50 AM, ChristianEhrhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Dann, I don't want to miss the activity here - so the next step you are > expecting is me to evaluate the diff in detal and prep a qemu SRU? > Along that you will do regression tests on arm and I could do x86/ppc/s390x? > > Is that correct then I'd create a ppa for both of us to do the checks or > is something missing that I should wait on?
Christian, Personally, I've pinned my activity here until the issue in Comment #2 is resolved upstream. Vijaya has submitted her patch upstream and it is under discussion: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg605138.html Until that concludes, I can't be 100% sure that QEMU will require no further patches. But once that is resolved, then I think your proposed plan above sounds good. -dann -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1710019 Title: support GICv3 ITS save/restore & migration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1710019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
