* Matt Zimmerman > This bug is being fixed by backporting the change which was tested in > Ubuntu 7.04 and 7.10.
Okay. > There's no telling what sort of random garbage folks have lying > around in /lib/firmware. Which one should be preferred, theirs or > ours? What happens if they're using a custom hook to get the > firmware they want? Copy over both images to the same locations they're found on the root file system and you'll get the same behaviour in initramfs as when the system is finished booting. I don't know where firmware_helper looks first, but as long as the behaviour is consistent, does it really matter? > Such a change shouldn't be rolled out without proper testing; the > minimal change used in the update is more appropriate for a stable > update. That change won't affect people that upgrade from 6.06 LTS from current to 6.06 LTS-next-update, nor people that upgrade from 6.06 LTS to 8.whatever LTS as long as it's changed there too. But it will cause a regression when going from 6.06 to 7.04 though unless it is changed there too, that's worth a thought I guess. Regards -- Tore Anderson -- Doesn't include qla2xxx firmware https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
