An SRU *to backport a new version* may not be acceptable if it risks breaking existing users. I hope the rationale for this policy is obvious. Unfortunately it's not possible to make a definitive statement unless someone does a technical assessment (which any suitably well- versed developer can do).
Is there a reason that the specific bug causing problems in Xenial cannot just be fixed on its own? That would probably be the easiest to drive unless there's some technical reason this is difficult. A backport of a newer version that introduces new features is generally always acceptable in the backports pocket, as this is exactly what backports users have opted in to receiving. It doesn't matter if such an update also fixes bugs; that's to be expected. ** Summary changed: - Obsolete 13.1 LTS branch release in Xenial + cdr_pgsql: SQL errors on inserting entries -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596405 Title: cdr_pgsql: SQL errors on inserting entries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1596405/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
