Public bug reported:

There was a somewhat acrimonious thread on ubuntu-users@ recently due to
unattended-upgrades being marked as a dependency of the ubuntu-mate-core
metapackage, starting at:

  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
users/2017-October/291825.html

Despite the intemperate language there, I think it's reasonable to say
that unattended-upgrades doesn't quite meet the usual threshold for
being marked as a dependency of the core metapackage: it does make sense
to have it there by default, but the system will function fine without
it if somebody has special requirements.  I suggest some variant of this
patch to the seeds:

=== modified file 'core'
--- core        2017-10-08 21:25:51 +0000
+++ core        2017-10-18 08:56:20 +0000
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ We use gnupg's pinentry support as of wi
  * (sessioninstaller)
  * software-properties-gtk
  * ubuntu-release-upgrader-gtk
- * unattended-upgrades
+ * (unattended-upgrades)
  * update-manager
  * update-notifier
  * (whoopsie)

** Affects: ubuntu-mate-meta (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1724499

Title:
  unattended-upgrades should probably be Recommends, not Depends

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-meta/+bug/1724499/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to