On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:20:00AM -0000, Matthias wrote: > I got CIFS to work (where is the difference to SMBFS anyway, isn't that > just another name for it?),
No. cifs and smbfs are different kernel modules. smbfs is no longer maintained and should be replaced by cifs. > However, what still doesn't work at all is mounting the CIFS share > directly without going through an SSH tunnel. The client just never gets > a response back from the server. As I said, ports 445 and 139 are > correctly forwarded and it works in the local network. It might be a > server issue, but I doubt it. It may also be your ISP that blocks port 445 and 139, as a lot of viruses use it to scan for windows computers. -- smbfs: mounting remote samba-filesystem leads to errors in /var/log/syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
