Launchpad has imported 26 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539740.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-11-20T22:36:47+00:00 Guillermo wrote: Description of problem: iptraf does not list the ethernet nic (eth0 in my case). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. su - 2. iptraf 3. ip traffic monitor Actual results: Lists All interfaces lo Expected results: All interfaces eth0 lo Additional info: Just discovered that it does not list my wifi nic either. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-10T10:33:48+00:00 Nikola wrote: strange I cannot reproduce it. ip traffic monitor does not exist try ifconfig eth0 up and than run again iptraf Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-10T14:03:15+00:00 Guillermo wrote: same results, the nic is up and configured. it also happens with wlan0. ip traffic monitor i mean > run iptraf, select ip traffic monitor (m), select interface (list appears, does not show eth0 nor wlan0) [root@movix ~]# uname -r 2.6.31.6-145.fc12.x86_64 [root@movix ~]# rpm -q iptraf iptraf-3.0.1-8.fc12.x86_64 [root@movix ~]# ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1B:38:72:A6:06 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:18 noticed its just a listing problem, when packets goes through the interface, iptraf shows the name of the interface correctly (eth0, wlan0). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-10T16:00:25+00:00 Nikola wrote: I cannot reproduce even on x86_64. I have only newer kernel. [root@nec-em18 ~]# uname -r 2.6.31.6-162.fc12.x86_64 [root@nec-em18 ~]# rpm -q iptraf iptraf-3.0.1-8.fc12.x86_64 [root@nec-em18 ~]# ifconfig | egrep "eth|lo" eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWadr 00:16:17:55:47:C0 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWadr 00:16:17:55:47:C1 eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWadr 00:04:23:C0:07:DE lo Link encap:loop back Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-10T17:44:23+00:00 Guillermo wrote: Created attachment 377538 iptraf not listing wlan0, nor eth0 Just to make it graphic. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-14T10:28:01+00:00 Nikola wrote: update your kernel. This should help. I have same issue with 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.x86_64 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-15T15:14:27+00:00 Guillermo wrote: (In reply to comment #5) > update your kernel. This should help. I have same issue with > 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.x86_64 Still, with # uname -r 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 same results :( Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-01-06T10:56:10+00:00 Nikola wrote: send me your ifconfig -a Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-01-06T20:35:20+00:00 Guillermo wrote: g# ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1B:38:72:A6:06 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:18 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:23 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:23 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:1867 (1.8 KiB) TX bytes:1867 (1.8 KiB) vboxnet0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 0A:00:27:00:00:00 BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) virbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr BA:82:D9:17:63:72 inet addr:192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:3584 (3.5 KiB) wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:4C:6B:DB:7E inet addr:200.109.190.122 Bcast:200.109.191.255 Mask:255.255.224.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21e:4cff:fe6b:db7e/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:395669 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:364443 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:234455729 (223.5 MiB) TX bytes:37416118 (35.6 MiB) wmaster0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-1E-4C-6B-DB-7E-80-3E-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 UP RUNNING MTU:0 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-01-14T17:52:38+00:00 Jan wrote: I have the same problem as described after upgrading from F11 to F12, kernel 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64. I've not tested it, but it's can be due to using NetworkManager? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-01-17T18:22:51+00:00 Guillermo wrote: (In reply to comment #9) > I have the same problem as described after upgrading from F11 to F12, kernel > 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64. I've not tested it, but it's can be due to using > NetworkManager? I dont think so, however i tested stoping NetworkManager, manually configuring my Nic eth0 and still getting the same results. $ uname -r 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64 NM should not interfere with iptraf operations. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-01T17:20:05+00:00 Jan wrote: Any news, always the same using the kernel 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64 and iptraf-3.0.1-8.fc12.x86_64. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-14T20:44:23+00:00 Guillermo wrote: No news, still same behaviour: [gomix@movix ~]$ uname -r 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 [gomix@movix ~]$ iptraf -v IPTraf Version 3.0.1 Copyright (c) Gerard Paul Java 1997-2004 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-15T09:23:25+00:00 Nikola wrote: I've made a fork. If you have a time try it compile and run it. If this not work try to use *iptraf -u* this should help you. https://fedorahosted.org/releases/i/p/iptraf-ng/iptraf-ng-1.0.1.tar.gz Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-15T17:25:41+00:00 Jan wrote: I've problem with compiling this code, see: make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/home/honza/tmp/wq/iptraf-ng-1.0.1' Making all in support make[2]: Entering directory `/home/honza/tmp/wq/iptraf-ng-1.0.1/support' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wall -Werror -std=gnu99 -pedantic -g -O2 -MT libtextbox_la-listbox.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libtextbox_la-listbox.Tpo -c -o libtextbox_la-listbox.lo `test -f 'listbox.c' || echo './'`listbox.c libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wall -Werror -std=gnu99 -pedantic -g -O2 -MT libtextbox_la-listbox.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libtextbox_la-listbox.Tpo -c listbox.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libtextbox_la-listbox.o cc1: warnings being treated as errors listbox.c: In function ‘tx_operate_listbox’: listbox.c:108: error: format ‘%d’ expects type ‘int’, but argument 4 has type ‘size_t’ listbox.c:108: error: format ‘%d’ expects type ‘int’, but argument 4 has type ‘size_t’ make[2]: *** [libtextbox_la-listbox.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/honza/tmp/wq/iptraf-ng-1.0.1/support' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/honza/tmp/wq/iptraf-ng-1.0.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-15T22:34:50+00:00 Nikola wrote: hmmm, morning better than evening. If you have a time join iptraf- [email protected]. We can find some solution. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-17T16:39:22+00:00 Nikola wrote: Created attachment 400824 0001-fix-strcpy-overlap-memory.patch I have a good news everyone. I found a problem in source code why is not NIC listed. Thanks to Jan. Patch is attached if you want to look and here you have a build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2059230 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-22T08:37:08+00:00 Nikola wrote: nobody wants to test it? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-22T09:14:14+00:00 Fedora wrote: iptraf-3.0.1-10.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iptraf-3.0.1-10.fc12 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-22T09:22:55+00:00 Fedora wrote: iptraf-3.0.1-10.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iptraf-3.0.1-10.fc13 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-22T14:40:56+00:00 Mihai wrote: With iptraf-3.0.1-10.fc12 I could see now all network interfaces: eth0, wlan0, lo etc. So bug is fixed. Many thanks! Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-22T15:04:29+00:00 Guillermo wrote: :) i'll test it asap Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-22T23:02:53+00:00 Guillermo wrote: Confirmed, the bug is fixed in my F12 x86_64 , :D Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-23T23:27:18+00:00 Fedora wrote: iptraf-3.0.1-10.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-23T23:30:40+00:00 Fedora wrote: iptraf-3.0.1-10.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update iptraf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iptraf-3.0.1-10.fc12 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-04-10T10:23:20+00:00 Fedora wrote: iptraf-3.0.1-10.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/comments/25 ** Changed in: iptraf (Fedora) Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: iptraf (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568164 Title: iptraf stop showes eth0/eth1 interface To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
