Launchpad has imported 28 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579461.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-05T10:21:33+00:00 Jan wrote:

Created attachment 404474
sample of an incorrectly printed document

Description of problem:
The latest update of hplip/hpijs broke printing to Color LaserJet CM1312nfi MFP 
printer - every page has black stripes instead of rows with all white pixels. I 
will attach the sample (lpr /etc/profile). Printing from a web browser or 
OpenOffice.org has the same problem.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
hpijs-3.10.2-2.fc12.x86_64
hplip-3.10.2-2.fc12.x86_64

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. connect the CM1312nfi printer over USB
2. configure it (I have set up only one non-default option - A4 paper instead 
of the default US Letter)
3. try to print a document (e.g. lpr /etc/profile)
  
Actual results:
Rows with at least one non-white pixel are printed correctly, all-white rows 
are printed all-black instead.

Expected results:
All-white rows should be printed white.

Additional info:
This is a regression - downgrading to 3.9.8-28.fc12.x86_64 versions of hpijs, 
hplip, etc. and recreating the printer queue fixes the problem.

In addition, I have also reproduced the bug #579355 on my setup.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/0

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-08T15:57:44+00:00 Jan wrote:

Additional note: I would like to report it upstream as well, but I am
not sure where the upstream is. I have tried to add a comment to the
"Known issues in 3.10.2" page (http://hplipopensource.com/node/340), but
the comment is still not published there after three days.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-08T17:09:00+00:00 Tim wrote:

Here's the upstream HPLIP bug tracker:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip

Sorry this hasn't been looked at yet, it is not forgotten...

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-09T12:21:42+00:00 Tim wrote:

I've just confirmed that the raster data looks correct before it is
processed by hpcups, so it looks like it really is an hpcups bug of some
sort.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-12T07:49:06+00:00 Jan wrote:

Reported upstream as https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/6

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-13T22:29:30+00:00 Tim wrote:

*** Bug 582000 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-13T22:30:15+00:00 Tim wrote:

Also affects:
  HP Color LasetJet 5550 pcl3, hpcups 3.10.2 (en)
  HP Color LasetJet 4700 pcl3, hpcups 3.10.2 (en)

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/8

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-15T15:50:33+00:00 Gavin wrote:

Also affecting:
  HP Color LaserJet CP2025dn pcl3, hpcups 3.10.2 (en)

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/10

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-15T15:57:36+00:00 Jiri wrote:

Can you try this version ? 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=167083
Thanks

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/11

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-15T18:28:57+00:00 Gavin wrote:

Jiri,

Thanks but this new build isn't working for we. No black lines where
whitespace should be, but page content is being printed in the top
25-33% of the page. The one thing that seems to be controlling how much
of the page gets printed upon is the presence of figures within the PDF
I was printing.

Text other than that along side the figures on the page is being printed
on top of itself at the very top of the page.

Sorry, best way I can explain it - I don't have access to a scanner here
to show you what the printout looks like.

I downloaded all the rpms for my system, installed using yum
localinstall, logged out/in, then deleted the current printer (HP Color
LaserJet CP2025dn) and added it again. The above behaviour was what
resulted.

The Test Print page prints out OK.

Is there anything else I can try/provide for you?

G

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/12

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-15T20:28:28+00:00 Tim wrote:

OK, that came from my bad guess about what to change.  What's happened
is that we've killed all the "move down [n] raster rows" commands, and
changed them into something else (move up or something probably).

Gavin, can you now do: yum downgrade 'hplip*' 'hpijs*' 'libsane-hp*'
and try changing the "Output Mode" option in the Printer Options for the queue 
from RGB to Gray?  Let us know if that gives correct blank lines.

I think I've found a useful clue in this document:
  "HP PCL/PJL Reference (PCL 5 Color) - Technical Reference Manual (bpl13212)"
  http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/bpl13212/bpl13212.pdf

Take a look at page 139, specifically this bit:

This command zero-fills the offset area. For color printers, zero-fills
are filled with the color of index 0, which is not necessarily white.

So I wonder if this is some problem with the indexed colour palette
getting its colours in a twist.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/13

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-15T21:49:20+00:00 Tim wrote:

Although it looks like it does set colour 0 to white (0xFF 0xFF 0xFF in
Device RGB).  That all looks fine. :-/

Here's another approach: I've built another hplip package which disables
the "move down [n] raster rows" function altogether, and instead sends
blank raster lines.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=167170

Could you give that one a go?

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/14

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-16T11:21:45+00:00 Gavin wrote:

Sorry for delay in getting back to you - printer in question is at work.

Tried the new build from comment #15. This works for me with:
  HP Color LaserJet CP2025dn pcl3, hpcups 3.10.2 (en)

The couple of PDFs I tried to print are now printing out as I would
expect - the whitespace printing as "black" blocks/lines bug does not
now occur.

I'm about the head of travelling for several weeks with work so I won't
be able to test anything further. Sorry about that; I'll catch up with
the bug when I get back. I head off on Monday so in the meantime if you
need anything further just shout.

Thanks for looking at this so quickly.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/15

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-16T14:48:09+00:00 Jiri wrote:

*** Bug 583056 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/16

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-16T16:03:52+00:00 Geoffrey wrote:

Hi Tim and/or Jiri,

I would be willing to try the build Tim mentions in comment 15.  What is
the procedure I should use to install this test build?  Do I have to
download each of the rpms listed in the build page, for my architecture,
and them rpm -i each of them?  Or is there a yum way to install this
test build in some simple command?

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/18

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-16T16:54:09+00:00 Gavin wrote:

(In reply to comment #19)
> Hi Tim and/or Jiri,

> Do I have to download each
> of the rpms listed in the build page, for my architecture, and them rpm -i 
> each
> of them?  Or is there a yum way to install this test build in some simple
> command?    

Geoffrey, to test I just downloaded the set of rpms into a directory,
cd'd into that directory and then did:

su -c "yum --nogpgcheck localinstall *.rpm"

Having first checked there were no other rpms in that directory.

HTH

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/19

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-16T17:15:07+00:00 Geoffrey wrote:

Okay, I've done that.  This corrects the problem on my HP cm1312nfi.
Output now looks normal.

Thanks much!  Seems like this would be good to push out into the updates
zone.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/20

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-16T17:57:35+00:00 Jan wrote:

3.10.2-6.fc12.x86_64 works for me (Color Laserjet CM1312nfi MFP). Please
push it to the updates repository.

And thanks for fixing this so quickly!

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/21

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-16T22:09:23+00:00 Fedora wrote:

hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/22

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-16T22:12:03+00:00 Fedora wrote:

hplip-3.10.2-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-6.fc12

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/23

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-16T22:13:21+00:00 Fedora wrote:

hplip-3.10.2-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-4.fc11

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/24

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-20T13:12:17+00:00 Fedora wrote:

hplip-3.10.2-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository.  If 
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update hplip'.  You can provide 
feedback for this update here: 
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-6.fc12

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/27

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-20T13:22:17+00:00 Fedora wrote:

hplip-3.10.2-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository.  If 
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update hplip'.  You can provide 
feedback for this update here: 
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-4.fc11

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/28

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-20T13:27:49+00:00 Fedora wrote:

hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository.  If 
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update hplip'.  You can provide 
feedback for this update here: 
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/29

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-21T09:30:58+00:00 Jiri wrote:

*** Bug 584164 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/30

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-23T22:53:54+00:00 Fedora wrote:

hplip-3.10.2-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/31

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-05-07T04:01:14+00:00 Fedora wrote:

hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/34

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-05-18T21:56:29+00:00 Fedora wrote:

hplip-3.10.2-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/comments/35


** Changed in: hplip (Fedora)
       Status: Unknown => Fix Released

** Changed in: hplip (Fedora)
   Importance: Unknown => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561264

Title:
  3.10.2 prints black stripes on CM1312nfi MFP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/561264/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to