Launchpad has imported 28 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746771.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-17T18:19:48+00:00 Sergey wrote: Description of problem: openstack-nova-* services fail to start except openstack-nova-volume server1 kernel: [ 1139.822573] nova-network[1634]: segfault at bf995000 ip 00c7c6b7 sp bf9936a8 error 6 in libc-2.14.90.so[b36000+1a7000] server1 systemd[1]: openstack-nova-network.service: main process exited, code=killed, status=11 server1 systemd[1]: Unit openstack-nova-network.service entered failed state. server1 kernel: [ 1140.217545] nova-api[1601]: segfault at bfd9a000 ip 0040b6a9 sp bfd964d8 error 6 in libc-2.14.90.so[2c5000+1a7000] server1 systemd[1]: openstack-nova-api.service: main process exited, code=killed, status=11 server1 systemd[1]: Unit openstack-nova-api.service entered failed state. server1 kernel: [ 1141.045279] nova-scheduler[1656]: segfault at 6e692f61 ip 00255950 sp bfb22778 error 4 in libc-2.14.90.so[110000+1a7000] server1 systemd[1]: openstack-nova-scheduler.service: main process exited, code=killed, status=11 server1 systemd[1]: Unit openstack-nova-scheduler.service entered failed state. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1) glibc-2.14.90-12.i686 glibc-common-2.14.90-12.i686 2) Linux server1.example.com 3.1.0-0.rc9.git0.0.fc16.i686.PAE #1 SMP Wed Oct 5 15:51:55 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux 3) openstack-swift-doc-1.4.0-2.fc16.noarch openstack-swift-proxy-1.4.0-2.fc16.noarch openstack-swift-container-1.4.0-2.fc16.noarch openstack-swift-1.4.0-2.fc16.noarch openstack-glance-2011.3-1.fc16.noarch openstack-keystone-1.0-0.3.d4.1213.fc16.noarch openstack-swift-auth-1.4.0-2.fc16.noarch openstack-swift-account-1.4.0-2.fc16.noarch openstack-nova-2011.3-3.fc16.noarch openstack-swift-object-1.4.0-2.fc16.noarch How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. for svc in api objectstore compute network volume scheduler; do sudo service openstack-nova-$svc start; done Actual results: Segfault Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-17T18:28:31+00:00 Sergey wrote: Service openstack-nova-volume is in running state Service openstack-nova-network is in running state after "Create user, project and network" step from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_create_OpenStack_user_project_and_network $> sudo nova-manage user admin markmc $> sudo nova-manage project create markmc markmc $> sudo nova-manage network create markmc 10.0.0.0/24 1 256 --bridge=br0 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-18T16:30:21+00:00 Mark wrote: Thanks for the report Sergey I wonder is this because you're on i686? I do my testing on x86_64 Could you try update to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14504 If you still see the segfault, try installing glibc-debuginfo and see if you can get a stack trace http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-18T16:31:37+00:00 Mark wrote: *** Bug 746767 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-18T19:14:39+00:00 Sergey wrote: Thanks for the replay, The latest update didn't help, so I try to do some debugging. glibc-common-2.14.90-12.999.i686 glibc-debuginfo-2.14.90-12.999.i686 glibc-2.14.90-12.999.i686 glibc-debuginfo-common-2.14.90-12.999.i686 I'm not strong with gdb... Especially we have python code here, So here are my steps, please help me if I'm doing wrong: [serg@server1 glance]$ gdb --args python GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (7.3.50.20110722-9.fc16) Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i686-redhat-linux-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>... Reading symbols from /usr/bin/python...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/python.debug...done. done. (gdb) run /usr/bin/glance Starting program: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/glance index [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". Detaching after fork from child process 2350. Detaching after fork from child process 2352. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. __memcpy_ssse3_rep () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/memcpy-ssse3-rep.S:158 158 movdqu (%eax), %xmm0 this is with nova: [serg@server1 glance]$ sudo gdb --args python GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (7.3.50.20110722-9.fc16) Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i686-redhat-linux-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>... Reading symbols from /usr/bin/python...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/python.debug...done. done. (gdb) run /usr/bin/nova-api Starting program: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/nova-api [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". Detaching after fork from child process 2605. Detaching after fork from child process 2607. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/eventlet/hubs/hub.py", line 336, in fire_timers timer() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/eventlet/hubs/timer.py", line 56, in __call__ cb(*args, **kw) SystemError: error return without exception set Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. __memcpy_ssse3_rep () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/memcpy-ssse3-rep.S:1169 1169 movzbl -1(%eax), %ecx I found a lot of information about printing stack etc., please let me know what information you want and the best way to get it Thank you Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-18T19:25:13+00:00 Sergey wrote: Created attachment 528877 I hope right debug info for starting nova-api I hope I've made the right dump for nova-api starting service Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-19T00:29:30+00:00 Pádraig wrote: Hmm, memcpy. That reminds me of the infamous bug 638477 I wonder is something in python land doing a memcpy on overlapping regions? I saw this crash in python (not related to nova) in the x86_64 F16 TC1 build. Note that was using an earlier version of glibc (2.14.90-10). I also noticed bug 737765 which may be related? I've not noticed any issues with a fully updated system (glibc-2.14.90-12). The last package update to libpython on my functioning system was Jul 8th, so that is an unlikely source of the issue (given its ubiquity also). Hmm I wonder is there some lib used by openstack using memcpy incorrectly. This is a long shot, but this gives a hit: readelf -Ws /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/greenlet.so | grep memcpy I had a quick look at the greenlet code and it seemed OK but I'm not sure. BTW Sergey it would help if you could in gdb: thread apply all bt full :) Scratch that, you've already attached that in comment 5. Well would you look at that. greenlet.c So it goes from there to python and back and then through some assembly and finally to the memcpy in slp_restore_state(). I'd put a breakpoint on that function and step through, to see if there were overlapping regions passed to memcpy. If so I'd change both instances of memcpy in that file to memmove. It could also be greenlet messing up the stack or heap or something. For kicks here is the crashing line. That's one crazy complicated memcpy: http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/memcpy-ssse3-rep.S;hb=HEAD#l1169 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-19T12:26:24+00:00 Mark wrote: Wow, this is an interesting bug alright It definitely looks like a greenlet bug to me. See this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/gevent/browse_thread/thread/fee2097e2f3bae5e Moving to greenlet. I'll see if I can isolate what the upstream fix was, or whether we can just update to a newer version with the fix Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-19T14:05:41+00:00 Mark wrote: Okay, I asked the Ubuntu maintainer (Dave Walker) and he pointed me to this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641 and they used this patch to fix their issue: https://bitbucket.org/ambroff/greenlet/changeset/2d5b17472757/raw/ certainly seems like the right area of code Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-19T14:10:39+00:00 Mark wrote: Also, as an aside - it looks like 0.3.1 is over 18 months old and there's a bunch of unreleased stuff in hg upstream. Some anonymous coward :) just asked about this yesterday: https://bitbucket.org/ambroff/greenlet/issue/32/greenlet-release-cycle Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-19T14:22:09+00:00 Pádraig wrote: Oh patch in comment 8 looks promising. I was reviewing the latest greenlet code last night rather than 0.3.1 :( Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-19T15:20:45+00:00 Mark wrote: btw - dmalcolm is looking into this now and can reproduce the issue on i686 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-19T15:21:56+00:00 Dave wrote: Created attachment 529032 Patch to add %check section to python-greenlet.spec Frame #2 of attachment 528877 is within slp_restore_state (), which is heavily dependent on CPU architecture and compiler version (calling conventions too, I believe). I noticed that python-greenlet.spec doesn't have a %check section. Attached is a patch to that file to add one, using upstream's test and benchmarking suite, so that we get some automatic test coverage on different architectures. $ koji build --scratch f16 /home/david/coding/dist-git-new/python-greenlet/python-greenlet-0.3.1-5.fc17.src.rpm Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3444123 Upon running that, I see a segfault in the i686 build within the %check section: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3444125&name=build.log test_generator (tests.test_generator.GeneratorTests) ... /var/tmp/rpm- tmp.ZnHd7D: line 32: 24482 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/python setup.py test Am bringing up an i686 test box to investigate further Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-19T15:53:31+00:00 Pádraig wrote: So i686 is the common factor. There have been recent changes there https://bitbucket.org/ambroff/greenlet/history/platform/switch_x86_unix.h Though x86_64 has fixes too https://bitbucket.org/ambroff/greenlet/history/platform/switch_amd64_unix.h Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-19T18:30:12+00:00 Dave wrote: Created attachment 529078 Proposed changes to package FWIW, I tried applying https://bitbucket.org/ambroff/greenlet/changeset/2d5b17472757 to our build, and the test suite then ran to completion on both architectures: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3444511 I'm attaching a patch to git python-greenlet, which adds that patch (slightly fixed up to apply cleanly) and modifies the specfile to apply it, and run the upstream test suite. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-19T20:48:54+00:00 Pádraig wrote: *** Bug 746330 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-24T15:59:13+00:00 Pádraig wrote: Created attachment 529915 upstream i686 assembly fix As I suspected, the i686 assembly patch from upstream also fixes the issue (independently of the other patch). I've included the previous upstream patch too, as that has been tested extensively on other systems. Note ppc64 is crashing with both of the above. I applied the upstream ppc_linux.asm file too to no avail. So for the moment I've done ExcludeArch ppc64 in the spec file. This will bork dependencies for ppc64 though right? Builds of theh attached patch available here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3456678 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-24T17:39:32+00:00 Pádraig wrote: Created attachment 529934 upstream i686 assembly fix 2 I've updated the patch to build on ppc64 and just exclude the checks. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3456815 You can apply this patch with `git am` Note I've not got commit access so can't apply this. Note F16 submission closes today :( Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-30T16:55:01+00:00 TR wrote: Any news on when this will be pushed to F16 testing? Thanks Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-30T18:16:38+00:00 Pádraig wrote: Well I've not received commit access yet, but I expect the resultant build to be the same as that in comment 17 which you can install/test directly. I'll escalate getting commit access next week Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-10-30T18:32:43+00:00 Kevin wrote: Sorry, I missed the commit request. I've approved it in pkgdb... Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-01T02:56:55+00:00 Fedora wrote: python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.fc15 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-01T02:57:04+00:00 Fedora wrote: python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.el6 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-01T02:57:12+00:00 Fedora wrote: python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.fc16 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/27 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-02T00:04:53+00:00 Fedora wrote: Package python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.el6' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-4822 then log in and leave karma (feedback). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-12T03:24:33+00:00 Fedora wrote: python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-25T02:03:53+00:00 Fedora wrote: python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-25T02:04:00+00:00 Fedora wrote: python-greenlet-0.3.1-6.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/comments/31 ** Changed in: nova (Fedora) Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: nova (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Undecided -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840641 Title: nova ftbfs (Sphinx? Segmentation fault) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/840641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
