> Looking at the Xenial numbers I believe -3 would result reasonably fast > builds with a tolerable increase in size compared to xz -6's results.
As you've seen, the rpi2 server image is the only place we're using this code today. We are not overly concerned with the build speed as these are highly-parallelizable builds that are not part of a critical pipeline. I believe we should go with xz -6; certainly for bionic and forward where we have actual parallelization, the build time penalty appears to be negligible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1732681 Title: Switching to to xz -0 from pxz increases compressed raspi2 image size To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1732681/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
