On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 4:51 AM, ChristianEhrhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dann, > maybe it was good to hold off on this. > It seems it causes a regression on arm, see bug 1734326. > Also by holding for an arbitrary amount of time it might block the SRU queue > for something else.
Sorry for the late reply - holidays, and behind on e-mail :( > If you agree I'd ask you to let the SRU team cancel the upload from proposed. I agree. I think it is best to scrap the zesty backport at this point. I will request the reject. > And you can then take time to: > a) continue with the kernel Team discussions > b) analyze how bug 1734326 would be related and how to fix it > > If you do so I'd immediately do a revert in the qemu git so that the > next SRU doesn't push the same by accident. > > @Coreycb - if done that way you likely want to cancel ocata proposed as > well. +1 cancelling the current ocata-proposed QEMU. I'll make a todo to investigate LP: #1734326 to see if it can be easily resolved and, if so, possibly request that we carry these patches as a diff in the ocata cloud archive. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1710019 Title: support GICv3 ITS save/restore & migration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1710019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
