Public bug reported:

Firstly, apologies if this isn't a bug in cifs.mount - I know it's
intimitly connected to a recent kernel updates which changed the default
SMB version cifs connects with, but I'm having trouble distinguishing
whether this behaviour is caused by the kernel change or a problem with
cifs.

On a recently built 16.04.3 LTS box with kernel 4.4.0-109, I was able to
mount to a network DFS share with the following

mount.cifs -o user=username //pathto/share /mountpoint

and after doing so, I was able to navigate through the mounted share,
and through the underlying DFS structure with no problems.  The mount
command notably contained 'vers=1.0' - which was expected.

After updating the kernel to 4.13.0.32, if I run the same command, the
share appears to mount, but I get a 'cannot access ...: Input/Output
error' when trying to move through a DFS mount within the mounted
filesystem.

Notably, the output from the mount command has 'vers=default'.

I understand from various sources, that the default SMB vers is now 3.0
- and if I mount this share explicitly with

mount.cifs -o user=username,vers=3.0 //pathto/share /mountpoint

Then I see 'vers=3' on the output from mount, and am able to use the
share as expected.

The man page for the cifs.mount cmd still says the default is SMB1.0
(this appeared to be the case with a kernel previous to 4.13).  The
kernel sources now say the default is SMB 3.0 - which would also be
find, if the share is mounted with vers=3.0.

But instead I'm seeing 'vers=default' - and I'm unsure as to what
version of SMB it's actually trying to use (if any) - whatever it is, it
doesn't work unless I explicitly set vers=3.0.

Thanks
Dave

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: Incomplete

** Summary changed:

- default vers value 
+ default vers value when mounting cifs shares with mount.cifs not working

** Description changed:

  Firstly, apologies if this isn't a bug in cifs.mount - I know it's
  intimitly connected to a recent kernel updates which changed the default
  SMB version cifs connects with, but I'm having trouble distinguishing
  whether this behaviour is caused by the kernel change or a problem with
  cifs.
  
  On a recently built 16.04.3 LTS box with kernel 4.4.0-109, I was able to
  mount to a network DFS share with the following
  
  mount.cifs -o user=username //pathto/share /mountpoint
  
  and after doing so, I was able to navigate through the mounted share,
  and through the underlying DFS structure with no problems.  The mount
  command notably contained 'vers=1.0' - which was expected.
  
  After updating the kernel to 4.13.0.32, if I run the same command, the
  share appears to mount, but I get a 'cannot access ...: Input/Output
  error' when trying to move through a DFS mount within the mounted
  filesystem.
  
  Notably, the output from the mount command has 'vers=default'.
  
  I understand from various sources, that the default SMB vers is now 3.0
  - and if I mount this share explicitly with
  
  mount.cifs -o user=username,vers=3.0 //pathto/share /mountpoint
  
  Then I see 'vers=3' on the output from mount, and am able to use the
  share as expected.
  
  The man page for the cifs.mount cmd still says the default is SMB1.0
  (this appeared to be the case with a kernel previous to 4.13).  The
  kernel sources now say the default is SMB 3.0 - which would also be
  find, if the share is mounted with vers=3.0.
  
  But instead I'm seeing 'vers=default' - and I'm unsure as to what
  version of SMB it's actually trying to use (if any) - whatever it is, it
  doesn't work unless I explicitly set vers=3.0.
+ 
+ Thanks
+ Dave

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1749214

Title:
  default vers value when mounting cifs shares with mount.cifs not
  working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1749214/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to