Public bug reported:

[Impact]
Source packages built on bionic where the upstream tarball comes with an 
upstream signature (.asc) are rejected by the ftpmaster, because dpkg-source 
there is too old.

[Test Case]
Build a source pkg with a tarball & .asc on bionic, extract on xenial

[Regression Potential]
depends on the backport strategy..

** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: Invalid

** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu Xenial)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  Source packages built on bionic where the upstream tarball comes with an 
upstream signature (.asc) are rejected by the ftpmaster, because dpkg-source 
there is too old.
  
+ [Test Case]
+ Build a source pkg with a tarball & .asc on bionic, extract on xenial
  
- [Test Case]
- Build a source pkg with a tarball & .asc, upload to ubuntu.
- 
- 
- [Regression Potential] 
+ [Regression Potential]
  depends on the backport strategy..

** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751114

Title:
  dpkg-source on xenial doesn't support .asc file in .dsc for v1.0
  source format

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1751114/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to