Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Source packages built on bionic where the upstream tarball comes with an
upstream signature (.asc) are rejected by the ftpmaster, because dpkg-source
there is too old.
[Test Case]
Build a source pkg with a tarball & .asc on bionic, extract on xenial
[Regression Potential]
depends on the backport strategy..
** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
[Impact]
Source packages built on bionic where the upstream tarball comes with an
upstream signature (.asc) are rejected by the ftpmaster, because dpkg-source
there is too old.
+ [Test Case]
+ Build a source pkg with a tarball & .asc on bionic, extract on xenial
- [Test Case]
- Build a source pkg with a tarball & .asc, upload to ubuntu.
-
-
- [Regression Potential]
+ [Regression Potential]
depends on the backport strategy..
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751114
Title:
dpkg-source on xenial doesn't support .asc file in .dsc for v1.0
source format
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1751114/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
