I think it is an UX regression to go from: $ sl The program 'sl' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: sudo apt install sl
to (hypothetically): $ sl The command 'sl' can be installed as: snap sl deb sl Because in fact neither of those are correct commands to install 'sl' :) Why was this done this way? Please minimally for the apt packages, use the same verbage (which users are comfortable with and can c&p) as the previous c-n-f implementation. Also, why can the snap packages not be provided with a similar `snap install...` output (with sudo or not, as appropriate, I guess). If a user does not know what a snap is, they are not given sufficient information from the c-n-f output to know what to do with the information now, which should be (IMO) consider a UX regression. And if something is both a snap and deb, they now are not given c&p commands to run. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1749777 Title: Syntax tweaks for snap-friendly output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/command-not-found/+bug/1749777/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
