Using the color 30 or 37 (black or white foreground) without setting the
background, or similarly, 40 or 47 (black or white background) without
setting the foreground is a pretty bad idea, since, without knowing the
terminal's color scheme (which is often white on black, or black on
white), it might easily result in unreadable text.

I don't see why links would be underlined, so I assume that 4 is also a
bug.

One possible explanation would be that it wanted to be 40 instead (white
text on black background), it's at least readable, although potentially
ugly, still doesn't explain that 5, and also the order of the three
numbers is really weird then.

My best guess is that that 4 is meant to be 48 (or even better, 38), to
use extended colors. In that case 5 is an additional parameter to that
(that is, no blinking), and 37 is yet another additional parameter (the
color index from the 256-color palette), resulting in a cyan-ish color.

This guess is also supported by the presence of "DIR 38;5;5" and "EXEC
38;5;202" in the file, which mean to use color index 5 (magenta) or 202
(bright red) for the foreground.

Note, however, that the use of such extended colors is also buggy, since
they are under TERM declarations that don't claim to support 256 colors.
"38;5;xx" and "48;5;xx" should only be allowed under sections of "TERM
whatever-256color".

"DIR 38;5;5" could simply be replaced by "DIR 35", it's the same color,
but terminals that don't support 256 colors cannot be expected to
understand the long format. For "EXEC 38;5;202" the best (simplest) is
probably to find a color from the legacy 8-color palette. Or reorganize
the entire file so that terminals with 256-color support have different
values.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752352

Title:
  symbolic links are blinking with byobu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/byobu/+bug/1752352/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to