No. sudo scanimage -L gives the same result. It does not detect the
scanner. However schroot with chroot of Ubuntu 16.04 detects it
correctly. See below.

peter@andromeda:~$ scanimage -L

No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different,
check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation
which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages).

peter@andromeda:~$ sudo scanimage -L
[sudo] password for peter: 

No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different,
check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation
which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages).

peter@andromeda:~$ schroot -c chroot:xenial
(xenial)peter@andromeda:~$ scanimage -L
device `brother4:net1;dev0' is a Brother Brother_DCP7065DN DCP-7065DN
(xenial)peter@andromeda:~$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012

Title:
  Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to