Foundations team, has anyone looked at ureadahead lately to make sure that it still makes sense to include it?
(a) I suspect SSDs don't benefit much from it (b) I suspect systems with spinning metal drives are also unlikely to have the memory to cache all those files, nor the free IO cycles to spend on caching. (c) If 90k files are ignored entirely because the paths are all relative, is anything being cached at all? I realize these are contradictory concerns. :) Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579580 Title: ureadahead reports relative path errors in journalctl output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/1579580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
