On 7/18/2018 2:25 AM, Steven Maddox wrote: > psusi: You've kind of cherry picked one possible way of looking at this > problem out of many different ways of solving it. > > You've also completely deleted my bug description and rephrased it down > to a single sentance - yet it still has my name on it. > > I can't say I'm very happy about it. I'd rather you start your own bug > in YOUR name... then close mine and say it is a duplicate of that.
I'm a bug triager; that's my job. You posted a novel, which is not a valid bug report that a developer can work on. I worked hard to get through reading it without my eyes glazing over and to pick out something that sounded like an actual bug. > Some other ways of looking at this problem are... > - Get 'Something else' to be able to make/modify LVM entities > - Get the automatic encryption option to have a 'install to free space' > mode... as it might not be Windows that you're installing alongside (so you > might need to resize that other OS first) > - Get the installer offering an encrypted swap partition and ensure when it > sets up the prompt for booting up the system - that is asks for one password > that works for both root and swap. > - And probably lots of other possible ways of looking at this... Which would you prefer instead of the one I picked? I can tell you that it is known and noted in other bug reports that Ubiquity does not have support for raid and the LVM support is very limited. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780971 Title: Insufficient options for encryption To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1780971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
