Packages like these are really hard to review from the SRU POV, as there
is no reliable test-case that can be applied. The mass-rebuild can be
one way, but that does not seem like an enough test for such an update.
I will be accepting this but what I would like to see during validation:
1) In some fresh PPA, perform a no-change rebuild of all vala rdeps (similar
to what was done already) with -proposed enabled to build against the actual
binaries we will have in the archive.
2) For those packages that FTBFS in the 1) PPA, create a separate PPA with
-proposed *disabled* and no-change rebuild those there. I want to see if they
also fail on what we have in bionic currently.
3) Perform some overall dogfooding of a few vala-built packages against what
is in -proposed, trying to see if things didn't get broken by the update. Just
seeing packages built seems like not enough of a validation.
** Changed in: vala (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782122
Title:
[SRU] Update vala in bionic to 0.40.8
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vala/+bug/1782122/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
