Hi Andres,

Thank you for the bug description updates. I like the headings you have
now, assuming "Bug fixes that introduce" is supposed to be "Bug fixes
that introduce behaviour changes". These are useful and is exactly the
information I needed in the SRU information to be able to review this.
Can I suggest that this be put into the MAAS SRU policy draft to speed
the process up for next time?

Are all the features added to 2.3.4 already present in the version of
MAAS in Bionic? I believe this is an SRU policy requirement for new
features. For example, I'm not sure about bug 1778710. This new feature
went in to both 2.3.4 and the 2.4 series, but it looks like this landed
in 2.4 in July yet xenial-proposed is based on an upstream tarball first
uploaded in June. Would someone using Xenial after this SRU lands and
benefiting from this feature face a regression in upgrading to Bionic?
If so, the feature needs to land in Bionic first, but I don't see maas
in the Bionic SRU queue.

I don't see any reason to block this from entering xenial-proposed based
on this so I'll keep reviewing, but if this is the case (and I've not
misunderstood your release workflow) then I think it would block a
release to xenial-updates until the corresponding update to 2.4.x hits
bionic-updates.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1772010

Title:
  [SRU] MAAS 2.3.4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1772010/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to