4.4.0-1032.38 - kvm
Regression test CMPL, RTB.

Test case ubuntu_ramfs_stress does not exist in the database, please check
42 / 49 tests were run, missing: ubuntu_blktrace_smoke_test, ubuntu_bpf_jit, 
ubuntu_cts_kernel, ubuntu_cve_kernel, ubuntu_ecryptfs, ubuntu_zfs_fstest, 
ubuntu_zfs_xfs_generic, xfstests
Issue to note in amd64:
  libhugetlbfs - failed 1 killed by signal 1 bad config 3
  ubuntu_fan_smoke_test - ubuntu_fan_smoke_test failed on 4.4 X-kvm kernel (bug 
1763323)
  ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests - 18 failed on chico
  ubuntu_ltp_syscalls - bind03 failed (bug 1788351) execveat03 failed (bug 
1786729) inotify07 failed with X/X-LTS/A kernel (bug 1774387) inotify08 failed 
with X/X-LTS/X-HWE/A kernel (bug 1775784)
  ubuntu_lttng_smoke_test - test should be disabled
  ubuntu_lxc - python3 API failed (bug 1764618)
  ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security - DEBUG_WX is expected to be unset for X-KVM 
kernel (bug 1788338)
  ubuntu_quota_smoke_test - failed with KVM kernel (bug 1784535)
  ubuntu_ramfs_stress - nfs-kernel-server package installation issue (bug 
1788336)
  ubuntu_stress_smoke_test - dnotify failed on KVM kernels (bug 1782723)
  ubuntu_vfat_stress - nfs-kernel-server package installation issue (bug 
1788336)
  ubuntu_zram_smoke_test - zram module not found (bug 1766823)

Note: expected test case list needs to be adjusted


** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
       Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
     Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Po-Hsu Lin 
(cypressyew)

** Tags added: regression-testing-passed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787182

Title:
  linux-kvm: 4.4.0-1032.38 -proposed tracker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1787182/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to