Launchpad has imported 15 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458903.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-05T19:09:13+00:00 Robert wrote: Description of problem: Lack of USB3 xhci patch makes SANE quite unusable with USB3 hardware; example with Fujitsu fi-6130 (theoretically fully supported by SANE): [root@tux ~]# scanimage -L # First run device `fujitsu:fi-6130dj:108292' is a FUJITSU fi-6130dj scanner [root@tux ~]# [root@tux ~]# scanimage -L # Second run a few moments later No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different, check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages). [root@tux ~]# Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): sane-backends-1.0.24-9.el7 How reproducible: Everytime, see above and below. Actual results: Lack of USB3 xhci patch makes SANE quite unusable with USB3 hardware. Expected results: Applying upstream USB3 xhci patch solves the issue (tested myself). [root@tux ~]# scanimage -L # First run device `fujitsu:fi-6130dj:108292' is a FUJITSU fi-6130dj scanner [root@tux ~]# [root@tux ~]# scanimage -L # Second run a few moments later device `fujitsu:fi-6130dj:108292' is a FUJITSU fi-6130dj scanner [root@tux ~]# [root@tux ~]# scanimage -L # Third run a few moments later device `fujitsu:fi-6130dj:108292' is a FUJITSU fi-6130dj scanner [root@tux ~]# Additional info: https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/sane-backends.git/plain/sane-backends-1.0.24-usb3-xhci.patch?id=e0bd4233ccf23151f4adfa14f45f328ae57c7c20 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-05T19:11:14+00:00 Robert wrote: Created attachment 1285126 sane-backends-1.0.24-usb3-xhci.patch Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-05T19:15:08+00:00 Robert wrote: Created attachment 1285127 Patch for sane-backends.spec Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-05T19:21:34+00:00 Robert wrote: Cross-filed ticket 01863749 on the Red Hat customer portal. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-06T07:44:23+00:00 Zdenek wrote: Hi Robert, thank you for contacting us, but it is too late to get this patch into RHEL-7.4, we will look into it for RHEL-7.5. I am deeply sorry for inconvenience. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-06T10:11:21+00:00 Robert wrote: RHEL 7.5 would be fine. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-19T07:06:55+00:00 Zdenek wrote: Robert, I think it would be better to include upstream commit 1207ce5a40664c04b934bd0a6babbc1575361356 too. It uses environment variable SANE_USB_WORKAROUND, which setting to 1 enables workaround, which is in your proposed patch. It could minimize impact for other users. Its usage will be explained in man page sane-usb(5). Do you agree, Robert? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-19T07:15:55+00:00 Zdenek wrote: Upstream issue for adding SANE_USB_WORKAROUND usage into man page https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=315792&group_id=30186&atid=410366 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-19T11:48:42+00:00 Zdenek wrote: Robert, would you mind testing these rpms from this link https://zdohnal.fedorapeople.org/.sane/ ? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-31T13:46:41+00:00 Zdenek wrote: Upstream accepted manpage patch as commit 56398ead607d8bcb9deef7ca3f4d7f78478f1b4c Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-08-14T12:54:21+00:00 Zdenek wrote: Created attachment 1313099 Proposed patch Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-08-14T12:58:25+00:00 Robert wrote: (In reply to Zdenek Dohnal from comment #8) > I think it would be better to include upstream commit > 1207ce5a40664c04b934bd0a6babbc1575361356 too. It uses environment variable > SANE_USB_WORKAROUND, which setting to 1 enables workaround, which is in your > proposed patch. It could minimize impact for other users. Its usage will be > explained in man page sane-usb(5). Do you agree, Robert? If the result is the same in the end, I don't mind about the details of the patch or whether to set an environment variable. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-08-14T12:59:18+00:00 Robert wrote: Do you still need a test for verification? Or do you have such hardware yourself around somewhere? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-08-14T13:03:31+00:00 Zdenek wrote: Yes, would you mind testing it? I do not have such HW unfortunately. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2018-04-10T13:47:21+00:00 errata-xmlrpc wrote: Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:0793 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1741977/comments/16 ** Changed in: sane-backends (Fedora) Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: sane-backends (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => High ** Bug watch added: alioth.debian.org/ #315792 http://alioth.debian.org/support/tracker.php?aid=315792 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741977 Title: Scanning fails with many Samsung multifunctions (SCX-3200, SCX-3400, CLX-6260) after upgrading to Ubuntu 17.10/18.04 (SANE_USB_WORKAROUND=1 needed) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1741977/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
