* -doc package: I think we should promote it as well in main, if the -dev is promoted. If so, this dep should be fixed: Depends: lynx | www-browser (first is lynx, in universe, www-browser is a virtual package not fullfiled?). In addition, it ships the doc in devhelp format (despite symlink from doc/ to gtk-doc/). I don't think anyway that those are needed, we don't tend to have -doc dep on a browser implementation. * Same remark than for the other MIR: let's look at enabling the testsuite during build + autopkgtests * Same kind of lintian warnings than for gupnp-dlna worths fixing or override + comments IMHO (gir-missing-typelib-dependency and typelib-package-name-does-not-match)
Minor: - VCS could be updated in debian/control* Pasting from gupnp-dlna: I think some of the stuff should be addressed like test running before I give my +1. This part doesn't deal directly with the network, but as we are looking at the whole dlna stack, I will defer to the security team for a review from a security perspective. I didn't spot anything crazy in the code itself, but I prefer deferring to experts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785629 Title: [MIR] gupnp-av To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gupnp-av/+bug/1785629/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
