* There are a lot of crash reports in launchpad. Those are several years old 
and shouldn't apply anymore. Maybe a little bit of cleanup of really old one, 
and looking at more recent ones will help once supported to review real new 
crashes (between launchpad and errors.ubuntu.com)?
* What is going to pull rygel on the iso: directly seeded or a recommends/deps 
somewhere? Note that there is as well rygel-tracker which shouldn't be promoted 
until tracker situation is deciphered.
* Some lintian warnings would be great to looked at, namely:
- W: rygel-2.6-dev: pkg-config-unavailable-for-cross-compilation (multiple of 
thm)
- W: rygel: uses-implicit-await-trigger interest /usr/lib/rygel-2.6 (line 1)
- W: rygel: uses-implicit-await-trigger interest rygel-restart (line 2)
* I guess rygel-preferences isn't going to be promoted, correct? (maybe we 
should list exactly the packages that are going to be promoted). It has a dep 
as linking on libgssdp-1.0-3, which is in universe.
* However rygel binary package has some dep issues as well:
 - dep on libgssdp-1.0-3 (gssdp source in universe) and libgupnp-1.0-4 (gupnp 
source in universe), which are not listed in the current MIR for the stack.
 - 2 recommends with its source in universe and not listed to be MIRed. They 
should be downgraded to Suggests, if possible: gstreamer1.0-libav and 
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly
* If we want to promote rygel-2.6-dev to main, there is again the 
libgupnp-1.0-dev dep as well which needs to be sorted out.
* librygel-server-2.6-2 is a dep of rygel, and depends as well on 
libgssdp-1.0-3 and libgupnp-1.0-4
* librygel-renderer-2.6-2 is a dep of rygel, and depends as well on 
libgupnp-1.0-4
* librygel-core-2.6-2 is a dep of rygel, and depends as well on libgssdp-1.0-3 
and libgupnp-1.0-4
* some copyright are missing:
  - 2008-2009 Florian Brosch
  - 2012 Choe Hwanjin <[email protected]>
  - 2013 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.
  - 2014 Jens Georg <[email protected]>
  - 2014 Atlantic PuffinPack AB. 
  - 2017 Samuel CUELLA]
  - Intel Corporation copyright should be extended to 2013
  - Jens Georg copyright should be extended to 2016
I may have missed others but that should be about it.

Opened question:
- tests are ran during package build, do we want autopkgtests (unsure if those 
are just unit tests or not, but it would maybe prevent at least vala 
regression)?
- the doc is in the -dev package. That's ok with me, weird to have different 
standards considering debian maintainer is the same than the other packages 
though.

I think there is a bunch of work to be done before going to another
review or give a conditional +1 on that one. I'll defer also to the
security team once the package is a little bit more ready from the pure
MIR perspective.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786489

Title:
  [MIR] rygel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rygel/+bug/1786489/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to