* -doc package: I think we should promote it as well in main, if the -dev is promoted. If so, this dep should be fixed: Depends: lynx | www-browser (first is lynx, in universe, www-browser is a virtual package not fullfiled?). In addition, it ships the doc in devhelp format (despite symlink from doc/ to gtk-doc/). I don't think anyway that those are needed, we don't tend to have -doc dep on a browser implementation.
Minor: - VCS could be updated in debian/control* Opened question: should the tests run as autopkgtests? (Unsure if they are pure unit or interact with the rest of the system) Nitpick: it's actually using dh10, hence dh_install --fail-missing instead of dh_missing. copyright file is correct and no binary package lintian warnings (apart from manpage)! :) So global +1 for me, after looking the -doc package dep. I think that as for the rest of the stack, some security check is good. I didn't spot anything special code-wise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799977 Title: [MIR] gssdp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gssdp/+bug/1799977/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
