@Steve,
"We have never represented the .manifest to be a public machine-parseable 
interface."

Thats clearly not true. Machine-formatted content (the .manifest)
advertised in a machine-formatted index (streams) is quite reasonable to
be expected to be machine parseable.

One example of something that parses that information is 'mfdiff'.  I do
not know for sure, but I suspect it was broken.  Anyone wanting to
determine if a specific/fixed version of a package would have come to
the decision to parse this file.

@Dimitri,
Changing the number of fields in a record of a tab delimited file and 
*additionally* changing the meaning of an existing field is not backwards 
compatible.


@Both,
Why not do this right?  Add a .manifest.json file.  You can determine the 
format of the file.


** Changed in: cloud-images
       Status: Incomplete => New

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
       Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803162

Title:
  non-dpkg information and broken format in manifest

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1803162/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to