Tentative +1 for these no-op backports of new packages to Trusty wearing my SRU hat, assuming they all work as expected, pending the ua- advantage-tools SRU readiness. I suggest landing these at the same time as the ubuntu-advantage-tools backport for which they're being backported. This way if there are any problems we won't be faced with a more difficult regression potential to negotiate for any necessary fixes, which will no longer be "new" packages with their somewhat easier SRU process.
I've reviewed the three packages currently in Trusty NEW as follows: libsodium: unmodified backport from Xenial. Changelog version looks correct and tracking bug reference present. New package so no diff of debian/ present or necessary. python-libnacl: unmodified backport from Xenial. Changelog version looks correct and tracking bug reference present. New package so no diff of debian/ present or necessary. pymacaroons: unmodified backport from Xenial (xenial-updates; xenial- proposed has a future version but according to the bug is pending deletion). Changelog version looks correct and tracking bug reference present. New package so no diff of debian/ present or necessary. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817665 Title: Please SRU the pymacaroons stack to Trusty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsodium/+bug/1817665/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
