It happens in 4.20-rc1, so should I try to bisect between 4.19 and
4.20-rc1?

I gave that a shot, but after labeling the first try "bad", the next
make gave me:

...
dpkg-source: warning: no source format specified in debian/source/format, see 
dpkg-source(1)
dpkg-source: info: using source format '1.0'
dpkg-source: warning: source directory 'linux' is not 
<sourcepackage>-<upstreamversion> 'linux-4.19.0-rc8+-4.19.0-rc8+'
dpkg-source: warning: .orig directory name linux.orig is not 
<package>-<upstreamversion> (wanted linux-4.19.0-rc8+-4.19.0-rc8+.orig)
dpkg-source: info: building linux-4.19.0-rc8+ using existing 
linux-4.19.0-rc8+_4.19.0-rc8+.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: building linux-4.19.0-rc8+ in 
linux-4.19.0-rc8+_4.19.0-rc8+-1.diff.gz
dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to vmlinux-gdb.py:
dpkg-source: error:   new version is symlink to 
/opt/kernel/linux/scripts/gdb/vmlinux-gdb.py
dpkg-source: error:   old version is nonexistent
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file .scmversion, use 
--include-removal to override
dpkg-source: warning: the diff modifies the following upstream files: 
...
dpkg-source: info: use the '3.0 (quilt)' format to have separate and documented 
changes to upstream files, see dpkg-source(1)
dpkg-source: error: unrepresentable changes to source
dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -i.git -b linux subprocess returned exit 
status 1
scripts/package/Makefile:71: recipe for target 'deb-pkg' failed
make[1]: *** [deb-pkg] Error 1
Makefile:1357: recipe for target 'deb-pkg' failed
make: *** [deb-pkg] Error 2


So I'm not sure where to go from here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818547

Title:
  hid-sensor-hub spamming dmesg in 4.20

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1818547/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to