[Duplication]
No duplication of that functionality in the Archive in general or main in
particular.
[Embedded sources and static linking]
This package does not contain embedded library sources.
There are some examples and docs but none of them qualifes as embedded source.
This package doe not statically link to libraries.
No Go package
[Security]
I can confirm that there seems to be no CVE/Security history for this package.
It Does not:
- run a daemon as root
- uses old webkit
- uses lib*v8 directly
- open a port
- uses centralized online accounts
- integrates arbitrary javascript into the desktop
- deals with system authentication
- processes arbitrary web content
- parse data formats
Django after all is a web framework, but this component seems to be on the
other end and not exposed.
Therefore IMHO there is no security review needed for this.
[Common blockers]
- builds fine at the moment
- server Team committed to subscribe once this gets promoted (enough for now)
- code is not user visible, no translation needed
- dh_python is used
- package produces python2 bits, but they are not pulled into main by mailman3
Not perfect but acceptable:
- the self tests are no run at the moment.
The reason is that they required a live solr server.
Therefore they would have to be a autopkgtest which isn't implemented
yet (but mentioned in d/rules)
[Packaging red flags]
- no current ubuntu Delta to evaluate
- no library with classic symbol tracking
- watch file is present
- Lintian warnings are present bug ok
- debian/rules is rather clean
- no usage of Built-Using
- no golang package that would make things harder
[Upstream red flags]
- no suspicious errors during build (a few warnings, but nothing concerning)
- it is pure python, so no incautious use of malloc/sprintf
- no use of sudo, gksu (only mentioned in docs which is fine)
- no use of pkexec
- no use of LD_LIBRARY_PATH
- no important open bugs
- no Dependency on webkit, qtwebkit, libgoa-*
- no embedded copies in upstream either
[Summary]
Ack from the MIR-Teams POV, as outlined above for this component a security
review seems not required.
** Changed in: django-haystack (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820185
Title:
[MIR] django-haystack as dependency of mailman3
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/django-haystack/+bug/1820185/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
