If you see that:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=zim&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.has_no_package=
then mean that I mean. It is stupid to report an error in zim when these
are not met. A package that is in this state of neglect should not
appear in the repository, it reduces user satisfaction and is useless
because the application is not usable.
I think than Agafonov is right. Consider the occasions on which an
application is uninstalled can be a good way to determine whether this
is or is not satisfactory.
An application that is installed on a few occasions, but that users will not
uninstall, may be unpopular, but satisfactory. When an aplicacións is
uninstalled the 90% of the time that is installed is not satisfactory. It
should consider the elimination of repositories in the event that its leaders
do not face their work.
I think that popcon.ubuntu.com I believe that the data used in
popcon.ubuntu.com to find out the popularity of an application are
insufficient. Marks atime ctime and can be affected by other events in addition
to the use of the application.
Uninstalling the application by almost all who have installed is more
significant.
--
Many applications of universe are neglected and produce frustration in users
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163037
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
