Surely if we're in agreement that we should be consistent, that means that we either patch to make them one way, or we patch to make them consistent the other way. Patching to make them inconsistent doesn't follow, and nor does not patching an exception to leave that one different from all the others.
> hold this one back as it might make it different Might is wrong. It _will_ make it different, and I don't think that's right. FWIW, users already have the option to easily override this behaviour for any set of services without having to worry about stepping on future packaging changes thanks to systemd's override features in /etc (systemd-system.conf(5)). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821927 Title: Systemd do not respawn sssd on failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1821927/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
