Uploaded. Wondering if it makes sense to actually release that fix and
have users install a pointless rebuild, or just keep it stuck in
proposed for whoever needs to do an SRU later?

** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
  according to
  
http://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20181222-bionic.html
  
  gpgme1.0 ftbfs.
  
  ********* Start testing of TofuInfoTest *********
  Config: Using QtTest library 5.9.5, Qt 5.9.5 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 
shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 7.3.0)
  PASS   : TofuInfoTest::initTestCase()
  PASS   : TofuInfoTest::testTofuNull()
  PASS   : TofuInfoTest::testTofuInfo()
  PASS   : TofuInfoTest::testTofuSignCount()
  PASS   : TofuInfoTest::testTofuKeyList()
  PASS   : TofuInfoTest::testTofuPolicy()
  FAIL!  : TofuInfoTest::testTofuConflict() 'sig.validity() == 
Signature::Marginal' returned FALSE. ()
-    Loc: [t-tofuinfo.cpp(458)]
+    Loc: [t-tofuinfo.cpp(458)]
  PASS   : TofuInfoTest::cleanupTestCase()
  Totals: 7 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 2386ms
  ********* Finished testing of TofuInfoTest *********
  FAIL: t-tofuinfo
+ 
+ [Test case]
+ build it
+ 
+ [Regression potential]
+ This only changes the test suite run during build, and that one currently 
fails, so it can't cause any regression.

** Changed in: gpgme1.0 (Ubuntu Bionic)
       Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813581

Title:
  gpgme1.0 ftbfs in 18.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme1.0/+bug/1813581/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to