Thanks for the link. It's a bit hard to defend it as "not technically a bug, because we're *deliberately* ignoring what you said to do", but I do understand the position (and even mostly agree with it, for what that's worth).
It's very confusing when you have multiple machines though, with some randomly getting updates and some not. A more complete design of the behavior would have allowed for a user-side threshhold control, but I imagine nobody wants to revisit it at this point, and I wouldn't blame them. :) Anyway, I should expect them all to update sometime in the next couple of days; and as long as that happens it's As Designed and the only "real" problem is that the behavior isn't communicated to users at all. Hopefully I'll remember to check then, and update this accordingly. Thanks again for the info. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842757 Title: update-manager does not follow settings and fails to update packages on time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1842757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
