** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
-  * libvirt became FTBFS in xenial due to other changes.
+  * libvirt became FTBFS in xenial due to other changes. Most likely a 
+    newer deboostrap that was used.
  
-  * The fix just modifies the self-tests (not the active code that runs
- in an ubuntu users env)
+  * The fix just modifies the self-tests (not the active code that runs in 
+    an ubuntu users env)
  
-  * The change is already active in Ubuntu in later releases via
- https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/commit/2be70b3
+  * The change is already active in Ubuntu in later releases via 
https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/commit/2be70b3
+ https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/commit/7baa0daf
+ https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/commit/0ce5eb75
  
  [Test Case]
  
-  * Build libvirt in Xenial on LP infra and while doing so do not trigger test 
fails in
-    test-openpty and test-posix_openpt
+  * Build libvirt in Xenial on LP infra and while doing so do not trigger 
+    test fails in test-openpty and test-posix_openpt
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
-  * Since we only change self-test code that runs at build time the runtime 
should show now 
-    regressions. The one thing I can think of is that a rebuild could always 
change something 
-    (even a no change rebuild) but since we want to bundle it with other SRUs 
there would be a 
-    rebuild anyway - hence I'd think this has no regression risk of its own.
+  * Since we only change self-test code that runs at build time the runtime 
+    should show now
+    regressions. The one thing I can think of is that a rebuild could 
+    always change something
+    (even a no change rebuild) but since we want to bundle it with other 
+    SRUs there would be a
+    rebuild anyway - hence I'd think this has no regression risk of its 
+    own.
  
  [Other Info]
-  
-  * This should not be fixed standalone but bundled with some other SRU to 
avoid useless rebuilds 
-    - and even more so - users downloading updates for now gain.
+ 
+  * This should not be fixed standalone but bundled with some other SRU to 
avoid useless rebuilds
+    - and even more so - users downloading updates for now gain.
  
  ---
  
  Due to a unknown other update libvirt became an FTBFS in Xenial.
  
  The issue shows up at build on launchpad infra and has two seld-tests broken.
  From the build log:
  FAIL: test-openpty
  ==================
  
  openpty returned -1
  FAIL test-openpty (exit status: 1)
  
  FAIL: test-posix_openpt
  =======================
  
  ../../../../gnulib/tests/test-posix_openpt.c:52: assertion '0 <= master' 
failed
  FAIL test-posix_openpt (exit status: 134)
  
- 
- This is somewhat familiar to bug 1641615 but showing up again in Xenial now 
for yet unknown reasons.
+ This is somewhat familiar to bug 1641615 but showing up again in Xenial
+ now for yet unknown reasons.
  
  The later re-occurrence of this outside of Xenial was later on fixed by [1] 
for good.
  Probably now triggering by some SRu of a lib into Xenial (or unlikely some 
change in the builder setup).
  We want to add that to Xenial as well to have it build fine again.
  
  [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/commit/2be70b3

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843674

Title:
  FTBFS of libvirt in Xenial

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1843674/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to