Now after we have understood it we know the fix is actually in binutils.
Furthermore any other third party code (or even a few other FTBFS in Eoan)
could be due to that.
IMHO that is a high prio to fix before Eoan as it would not be a new bug bur a
regression.
I'll set it as critical, but it is up to you having more experience in such
issues.
@Doko - can we get this fixed in Eoan?
** Changed in: ipxe (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: ipxe (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843394
Title:
FTBFS in Eoan - Error: operand type mismatch for `push' - gcc 9.2.1 /
binutils 2.32.51.20190905-0ubuntu1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1843394/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
