@Xnox - I did a similar check, not a deep look but maybe 30 minutes of diff parsing. I did come to the same conclusion. My gut feeling was more like "If security wants to get TLSv1.3 into Bionic Apache then we'd be better off considering to make the 2.4.38 of Disco available in Bionic (with all the Pros and Cons that comes with).
So yeah, IMHO 'Won't Fix' or 'Consider backport new major version'. In between those two would be the backports pocket, but the support statement for -backports is too weak. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845263 Title: [wishlist] Add TLSv1.3 support to apache2 on Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1845263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
