Hello, On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 04:42:44PM -0000, Thayne wrote: > Maybe there is a better way to do this, but here is my situation. I need > to be able to send DNS queries to multiple dns servers in parallel and > use the first response I get back (so that I use the fastest/closest dns > server).
That's a pretty unusual requirement, which at the very least means that more of your bandwidth is being used for DNS traffic than would otherwise be the case. Can you help me understand the motivation underlying the requirement? Do you have DNS servers in your configuration which are always farther / slower? If so, why do you have them in your configuration at all? Do you have a particular application requirement for low-latency DNS resolution - and if so, wouldn't the use of a caching local resolver (a configuration which resolved supports, and which we enable by default) have more of an impact on satisfying that requirement? We should certainly ensure that your use case is addressed with resolved itself, and without the need to run dnsmasq as an alternative local resolver. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745463 Title: Disabling systemd-resolved breaks dhclient resolvconf integration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/1745463/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
