> The header of debian/patches/lp1845909/0001-network-rename- linux_configure_after_setting_mtu-to-linux.patch in the eoan upload appears to be a lie;
sorry, I didn't change the patch description from upstream, where my patch actually did only change the function name. This patch includes some change from upstream commit 4ff296b02411bb4f0dc38f48cbab06f8645d2a08 because it is the proper way to handle errors in the mtu handler function, but it's a large patch that I didn't want to fully backport without reason. Do you need me to update the patch description with that text and re- upload, or should I separate out the specific change from the other commit into a separate patch? > And the statement in the description of this bug that "that commit is already included in Eoan so this sru is needed only for Disco" is at odds with the 5 patches related to this bug that are in this debdiff. will update the sru template. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845909 Title: [SRU] IPv6 link local address is assigned even when LinkLocalAddressing=no|ipv4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1845909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
