Reflecting on this situation I think if we where not developing for an LTS release, having two python DBUS interfaces in main for an interim release period of 9 months might be acceptable; but we're not in that position so I'd suggest that we stick with the older python3-dbus based secretstorage for 20.04.
This means we only have a single DBUS interface to support for an LTS (5/10 years) and we give the other upstream projects a bit more time to make the switch (maybe with some nudging/recommendation). We can review again at the start of the 20.10 development cycle to see how things have progressed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861268 Title: [MIR] jeepney To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jeepney/+bug/1861268/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
