per check fedora repo. I think the patch used in fedora should be the same as the one mentioned in #1. [1] vs [2]
However, it seems the maintainer of lshw wants something better. Refer to [3] IMHO, the existing one shall works for most cases for now. We might have certain in-compatibility in the future as the maintainer land something else. However something partially works still helps us, right? [1] https://github.com/lyonel/lshw/pull/45/commits/16e1d7b9e9a1aa69a59867de0aad6411c953fbfc [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lshw/blob/master/f/lshw-B.02.18-nvme.patch [3] https://ezix.org/src/pkg/lshw/pulls/27 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1705064 Title: lshw doesn't have logicalname, serial number, or size for nvme device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1705064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
