That is a manual dependency in dpdk-doc, it might have been outdated by
changes in the archive but why haven't we seen it in PPA and PPA based
dep8 tests at all.
95 Package: dpdk-doc
96 Section: doc
97 Architecture: all
98 Multi-Arch: foreign
99 Build-Profiles: <!nodoc>
100 Homepage: https://dpdk.org/doc/guides/index.html
101 Depends: fonts-font-awesome,
102 fonts-lato,
103 fonts-roboto-slab,
Ah the reason it shows up is because:
- dpdk-doc is in main
- we changed it to depend on fonts instead of shipping them [1]
- fonts-roboto-slab was in main in the past D/E so we considered it no problem
- but in Focal it is only in universe
- up to Eoan sphinx-rtd-theme-common (main) held fonts-roboto in main
We could re-promote fonts-roboto as it had it seems to have had its MIR
approval in the past.
But actually dpdk-doc is a leave package and I don't want people to
believe too much in the full-support of the examples in there (they
really are just examples, and sometimes out of date). I think the better
choice is an exclude from the auto-addition of -doc packages.
A matching MP is here:
=> https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/381289
[1]:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk/-/commit/ba2f9efeaa7b26b43d1414ea8e7ebfba5c1b3059
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869147
Title:
Update DPDK to the 19.11.1 stable release
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1869147/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
