I'll let Michael elaborate but I really don't see how that wouldn't work. 20.04 is introducing *NEW* alternative 'writable' label for persistent partitions. This is a brand new label that is being introduced.
So my take on this is that, if we are introducing a brand new label for persistent partition, we might as well use 'persistence' instead of 'writable', because 'persistence' is what Debian live uses. We are at the precise point where we do have a choice in a new alternative label name being introduced, so my point is that, rather than FRAGMENT the persistent landscape further, by having each distro do whatever the heck they want with no regards for what the others do, we should try to BRIDGE it. As such, I will assert that if you do have an issue with using 'persistence' as a label, then you also have an issue with using 'writable' as a label (which is what Michael proposes), and are voting to not have a new alternate label being introduced at all, which is actually something I can rally with, since, unless it is done to bridge the gap, I really don't see the point of introducing yet another label for persistent partitions... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863672 Title: The 'new' persistent live method starting in 19.10 no longer works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1863672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
