Simon, Could you please help identifying the current status of this bug ? Your original merge requests were postponed to the next SRU for rsyslog in Bionic, Disco and Eoan, correct ?
During verification time you discovered the difference between "bin" and "sbin" for the apparmor rule, is that it ? Than the verifications have been marked as failed. >From @paelzers comments I see that Focal is good. Should we re-try a SRU for *at least* Bionic here in this bug ? Or just let it hang for documentation purposes if others face this (since SRU is too small to be accepted directly) ? Any thoughts ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827253 Title: [apparmor] missing 'mr' on binary for usage on containers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1827253/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
