Is the drive actually Corsair_Force or some white-label OEM who bought bulk Corsair_Force drives and were supposed to configure the WWNs before shipping the drives?
I think we should reject WWNs 0x0, or like things with consecutive numbers. Cause I remember in whoopsie database we had lots of devices with serial numbers 987654321. Or at least we should ignore duplicate WWNs from non-multipathed drives. And say, well this is bogus, let's try to identify these by path, or some such. Not sure if we can implement that in probert to not generate non-multipathed drives with duplicate WWNs and purge them all, and emit warnings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876848 Title: Installation of Focal on a linux raid consistently fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1876848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
