> - apart from feedback given by @mruffell, to also check if any of
librcu consumers are depending on a full membarrier - driven by kernel -
for ** shared pages among different processes **

this is a good point, although I don't think liburcu makes guarantees
like that, for memory barriers outside of the current process; for
example, the -qsbr, -md, and -signal flavors don't use sys_membarrier at
all.

@mruffell have you looked into that aspect of the change?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876230

Title:
  liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address
  performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liburcu/+bug/1876230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to