Hi Damon, thanks for that. >There is a new feature in 0.9.24 which is a more realistic candidate for >regressions: the feature >to provide the use the option of automatically creating a tar file of the >program configuration >file and log files when submitting a bug report. See this documentation for an >illustration
So, this is an immediate red flag for SRU consideration. Any new features pretty much automatically disqualifies it from consideration. We can try, but I can't guarantee it would be allowed so much as 0.9.23 would be a more likely candidate to be allowed, especially since it's in upstream Debian already. If you can somehow justify that the new feature is a bugfix, then that would be more likely allowed. However, at this time, I'm leaning heavily on the conservative approach of using 0.9.23. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873944 Title: Upgrade rapid-photo-downloader to version 0.9.23 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rapid-photo-downloader/+bug/1873944/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
