On 2020-06-02 8:50 p.m., Chris Halse Rogers wrote: > You don't *have* to include the full output of the test cases when > verifying a bug (although, depending on how much output there is, it can > be nice).
OK, good, thanks for clarifying! > I don't think it was clear that you *had* gone through the full test- > case in your verification comment - I'm not entirely sure what gave that > impression, but I think it might have been the combination of *some* > output (the apt/dpkg bit) and saying “the bug is fixed, thanks” without > making reference to the test case. True, I should have been more explicit, duly noted! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872564 Title: /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id rule missing from abstractions/nameservice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1872564/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
